Real GRC, sized for one

You’re doing a whole GRC team’s job.
Alone.

Today’s GRC makes you choose: hire a team, hand your data to someone else’s cloud, or trust AI that never looked. GRC Solo is none of those — real GRC one person runs, on your own infrastructure, that shows you its own posture first.

See it work — no signup
GRC Solo observing reality vs. what you declared — the live worklist
Reality vs. what you declared — observed live, not self-attested.

Why us

Every GRC vendor asks for your trust.
We show you ours.

Transparency 1 — our posture

Our trust site is real, not a marketing page.

Most GRC vendors publish a polished trust badge. We publish what a connector actually observed about our own security — tiered by whether it’s observed or merely declared, the same way the product tiers yours. A GRC tool that won’t show its own posture is asking you to do what it won’t.

OBSERVED, not asserted — applied to us. → /trust

Transparency 2 — how we run

One operator, many AI agents — in the open.

GRC Solo is built and run AI-native: the human makes the judgment calls, the agents do the reading, the ledger remembers. We don’t hide that — it’s the point. The next wave of companies will be solo operators with dozens of AI agents, and GRC Solo is the assurance layer built that way, and for that world.

The operating model is the proof of the thesis.

See our live posture →

Evaluate on your terms

Built for how you actually buy now.

You don’t buy from a booth anymore. You research, you verify, you shortlist — then you talk. GRC Solo is built for that: see it work on a synthetic company with no signup, interrogate our grounded assistant (it cites its source or refuses), and read our live posture before you spend a minute on a call. The evaluation is self-serve because the product is.

The difference

Store what you declare, or observe vs. declare.

Typical GRCGRC Solo
EvidenceYou (or an AI) declare it’s doneA connector observed it — “verified” means verified
The AI’s jobAuto-generates your evidenceReads reality and flags; you approve every consequence
Your dataRouted through their cloudNever leaves your walls — one federated install
RiskA red / amber / green colourA defensible dollar figure — so you fix what costs you most
Their own postureA polished trust badgePublished, observed and tiered — we show you ours

The product

It’s a loop, not a dashboard.

Every other GRC tool is a place to store what you declare. GRC Solo is the loop that keeps your declarations true: you declare your program in prose, it observes your real environment, reconciles the two, and routes each gap to a decision that’s remembered — then re-baselines and runs it again.

ObserveProvenance tiers — observed vs declared
Know which claims a connector actually saw. “Verified” means verified — not a box someone ticked.
ReconcileDocument-to-reality reconciliation
See the gap before the auditor does — every requirement carries its real, observed state.
DecideAppend-only decision ledger
Every consequential call is remembered — who, when, why. The loop’s memory, not another dashboard tile.
Across the loopRisk, quantified
Put a defensible number on the risk — not a colour on a heatmap — so the decision is grounded.

The real thing — not mockups

Observe — reality vs. what you declared
Quantify — loss exposure, engine-computed
Operate — the solo cockpit
Prove — verified against live state

Then it re-baselines: the decision updates your declared program, and the loop turns again — continuously, solo-runnable, on your own infrastructure. Not an annual scramble; a system that stays in sync.

The screens above are the real product on the synthetic NovaHR demo tenant — every figure is live-computed from observed state, never fabricated.

The moat — federated by default

Run it on your own infrastructure —
your security data never leaves your walls.

Every other GRC tool routes your security data through their cloud. GRC Solo runs as one isolated install per company — never a shared-cloud partition. Federate it on your own infrastructure and it observes your reality without your data ever leaving your walls — nothing on our side to breach or subpoena. (Prefer hosted? Still your own isolated install, never a shared tenancy.) Real data sovereignty, by design.

The outcome: the busywork gets handled, and you run an effective, always-current risk-reduction program — solo, without a team and without surrendering your data.

Fix what matters most

You can’t fix everything alone.
Fix what costs you the most.

Every other tool hands you a wall of red. GRC Solo puts a dollar figure on each gap — your real loss exposure, computed from what a connector actually observed — and ranks them. So the one person doing the whole job knows the three moves that most reduce the number, and does those first. Risk you can defend to a board; a queue you can actually clear.

Quantify — not colour-code

What is your risk worth in dollars?

Estimate your annual loss exposure — then see how GRC Solo computes it from your real posture and ranks the few gaps to fix first.

Estimate exposure →

Pricing

Priced against a hire, not a department.

The real alternative to serious GRC is a platform subscription plus a dedicated hire. GRC Solo is priced against that combined cost — one operator’s output, multiplied, at a fraction of the loaded spend, with your data on your side.

Private preview — pricing indicative. Public access opening soon.

Questions

Straight answers.

Where does my data live?

On your side. GRC Solo runs as one install per company — hosted, or federated on your own infrastructure. Your operational security data never gets routed through our cloud. Data sovereignty is the default.

Which region is my data in, and which regions do you serve?

Your operational data never leaves your infrastructure — residency is your choice. The only thing we store is the email you submit, held in US-East (Ohio). We serve US businesses today; EU, APAC and other regions are on the roadmap, and the federated model makes them a clean fit when we open there.

How do I get my data out if I leave?

You own your install and the control library you build — export is yours at any time, and nothing is trapped in our schema. If we vanished, your program keeps running on your own infrastructure.

Is this “policy-as-code”?

No. Turning your policies into code throws away the prose a human and an auditor actually read. We keep the written policy as the anchor and reconcile each requirement against its real, observed state. The document stays — it just stops drifting out of sync with reality.

Do you use autonomous agents to write my evidence?

No — deliberately. An agent that generates your evidence is an agent that can fabricate it. We observe your environment, tier every claim by whether a connector actually saw it, and route any consequential judgment to you. The AI does the reading; a human does the vetting; the ledger does the remembering.

Does my data train your AI?

No. The assistant runs on Anthropic’s API, whose default is not to train on inputs. In the product the AI reads your environment on your side and routes consequential judgments to you — it never generates your evidence, because an agent that writes your evidence is one that can fabricate it.

How is this different from a generic GRC platform?

Three structural things: it’s federated (your data stays yours), you own your control library forever (no lock-in to someone else’s schema), and every AI read ends at a tracked, provenance-stamped decision — not just another dashboard tile.

What exactly is an “install” — is pricing per company or per client?

An install is one isolated deployment for one company. Pro is a single install; Business is up to five installs (built for fractional CISOs running multiple clients); Enterprise is multi-install with custom terms. Pricing is per install, not per user.

Do you have SOC 2, a DPA, and a subprocessor list?

SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 alignment are on our roadmap — and we say so plainly rather than imply a badge we don’t hold yet. A DPA is available on request (/dpa), our subprocessors are published (/subprocessors), and our vulnerability-disclosure policy is live (/security).

Does this make me audit-ready, or replace my auditor?

Neither, and we won’t pretend otherwise. GRC Solo reconciles each requirement against its real, observed state and gives you a mapping you can explain to an auditor. You walk in knowing the gaps; your auditor still audits.

What frameworks does it cover?

An ISO 27001:2022 spine, plus the ability to import the frameworks you need into your own control library (SOC 2, NIST CSF, CIS, and more) with a mapping you can explain to your auditor.

What does onboarding look like?

Install, connect your first source, and the system starts reconciling. A guided first-run checklist walks you to first value; Enterprise gets white-glove onboarding.

Don’t take our word for it — that’s the whole idea.

Private preview. Walk through the product on a synthetic sample company, then look at our own live posture — real GRC, sized for one, running where your data already lives.

We use your email only to contact you about the private preview — no tracking, no sharing. Privacy.

See it work →Our live posture →

GRC Solo — AI-native GRC for solo operators